So Borg's an idiot, I get that. But usually I just think that because he thinks so many fouls are red card worthy. But this week I don't understand the reasoning behind the two DOGSO incidents. He says Guzman doesn't deserve a red because Roy Miller was "close enough to challenge." (That doesn't even take into account the fact that the first leg grab was much earlier and no Portland defender was around) But for Seattle and LA, and the Torres DOGSO, he has no problem with Torres getting the red despite the fact that there is another Seattle defender about 3 feet away.